MSOE Library Home
MSOE Library Home
 Home 
 Search 
 My Account 
   
BasicAdvancedPowerHistory
Search:    Refine Search  
> You're searching: Walter Schroeder Library, Milwaukee School of Engineering
 
Item Information
 HoldingsHoldings
 
 
 More by this author
 
  •  
  • Knowles, John Alexander
     
     Subjects
     
  •  
  • Microsoft Visual BASIC.
     
  •  
  • Structural frames
     
  •  
  • BASIC (Computer program language)
     
  •  
  • Strains and stresses
     
  •  
  • Structural analysis (Engineering)
     
  •  
  • MSST Project.
     
     Browse Catalog
      by author:
     
  •  
  •  Knowles, John Alexander
     
      by title:
     
  •  
  •  First and second ord...
     
     
     
     MARC Display
    First and second order analysis of a steel gable frame using Visual Basic programming / by John Alexander Knowles.
    by Knowles, John Alexander
    Subjects
  • Microsoft Visual BASIC.
  •  
  • Structural frames
  •  
  • BASIC (Computer program language)
  •  
  • Strains and stresses
  •  
  • Structural analysis (Engineering)
  •  
  • MSST Project.
  • Description: 
    222 leaves : ill. ; 29 cm.
    Contents: 
    Thesis advisor: Dr. Richard DeVries
    Committee members: Dr. Douglas Stahl, Dr. Hans-Peter Huttelmaier
    Introduction -- Background and literature review - Using the gable frame program -- Results and program verification -- Conclusions and recommendations -- A: Visual Basic code -- Gable frame program results -- C: MathCAD worksheets -- D: Commercial software results.
    The purpose of this capstone design project is to develop a software program with Visual Basic (VB) programming language that analyzes the forces and deflections of a steel gable frame. The BV program finds the shear, moment, and axial forces in a four-member gable frame using either a first order static analysis or a second order single step Euler method. The results were compared to a MathCAD sheet and to the commercial software RSTAB, which uses the Timoshenko non-linear method for its second order analysis. The results for the first order analysis were identical between the VB program, MathCAD sheet, and RSTAB except for a 0.1% difference in moment. Approximating uniformly distributed loads with nodal point loads causes this difference. The second order results were similar for a practical building frame. The comparison between the VB program and RSTAB produced a 4.3% difference for global deflections, 7.8% difference for bending moments, and 6.1% for support reactions. For impractical building frames with large deflections, the results were also different (3.5% difference for global deflections, 3.7% difference for bending moments, 3.1% for support reactions, 9.8% for axial forces, and 3.3% for shear forces). The difference between the VB program and RSTAB can be attributed to the second order analysis method, Timoshenko (RSTAB) versus Euler method (VB). Also the VB program rotating loads on the deformed geometry causes result differences. The second order analysis results were identical between VB and MathCAD because they both used the Euler method.
    Add to my list 
    Copy/Holding information
    LocationCollectionCall No.Status 
    Walter Schroeder LibraryMaster's ThesesAC805 .K617 2010AvailableAdd Copy to MyList

    Format:HTMLPlain textDelimited
    Subject: 
    Email to:


    Horizon Information Portal 3.25_9885
     Powered by SirsiDynix
    © 2001-2013 SirsiDynix All rights reserved.
    Horizon Information Portal