MSOE Library Home
Login
My List - 0
Help
Home
Search
My Account
Basic
Advanced
Power
History
Search:
Author Keywords
Barcode
Bib No.
Call Number Keyword Search (Enter part of a call number -- use wildcards)
General Keyword Search
Keyword Search of Contents Notes
Keyword Search of Credits Notes (Enter word or words)
Keyword Search of Format
Keyword Search of Item Description
Keyword Search of Publisher's Name
Name Keyword Search
Publication Date Keyword Search
Search Part of an ISBN Number
Search Part of an ISSN Number
Series Title Keywords
Subject Keywords
Title Keywords
Refine Search
> You're searching:
Walter Schroeder Library, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Item Information
Holdings
More by this author
Schwingle, Shannon, author.
Mahuta, Dr. Frank
Kaszubowski, Kenneth, committee member
Shimek, Gary
Milwaukee School of Engineering
Subjects
Hydraulic fracturing -- Environmental aspects.
Oil-shale industry -- Environmental aspects.
Sewage -- Purification
Water -- Purification
Water reuse
MSEV Project.
Browse Catalog
by author:
Schwingle, Shannon, author.
Mahuta, Dr. Frank
Kaszubowski, Kenneth, committee member
Shimek, Gary
Milwaukee School of Engineering
by title:
Fracking wastewater ...
MARC Display
Fracking wastewater : recommendation for cost efficient wastewater treatment in the fracking industry a report submitted to the faculty of the Milwaukee School of Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Engineering / by Sharon Schwingle.
by
Schwingle, Shannon, author.
, Mahuta, Dr. Frank
, Kaszubowski, Kenneth, committee member
, Shimek, Gary
, Milwaukee School of Engineering
[Milwaukee School of Engineering], [2017]
Subjects
Hydraulic fracturing -- Environmental aspects.
Oil-shale industry -- Environmental aspects.
Sewage -- Purification
Water -- Purification
Water reuse
MSEV Project.
Description:
75 leaves : illustrations, some of which are in color ; 29 cm
Contents:
Introduction -- Background -- Literature review -- Methodology -- Results and discussion -- Conclusions and recommendations.
The purpose of this paper is to explain a project in which wastewater treatment methods associated with hydraulic fracturing (fracking) were investigated. The goal of the project was to determine the most cost effective treatment method. A review of relevant literature was first conducted in order to develop an understanding of fracking and its technology, as well as associated issues, including fracking chemicals, environmental impacts, and regulatory concerns. Literature was additionally reviewed--and operators in the industry were consulted--in order to identify fracking wastewater treatment methods, practices, technology, and issues. Findings from this review of literature indicated that fracking wastewater characteristics vary from region to region, and even from well to well. As a result, no universal treatment method exists at this time. Instead, a proliferation of treatment methods were identified. Because of this state of affairs, it was recognized that project scope limitations needed to be imposed. These limitations included a focus on geographic region and on treatment methods. Although fracking occurs in several regions of the United States, this project focused on the Marcellus Shale region. A common treatment method and a relatively new method were the criteria employed to select two treatment options. A common treatment method in the Marcellus Shale region is the transportation of fracking wastewater to a centralized wastewater treatment (CWT) facility. A life cycle analysis was conducted in order to compare this treatment method with a new on-site evaporation method, Purestream's Accelerated Vapor Recompression (AVARA) system, in which wastewater can be re-used in a fracking operation. The main finding is that the AVARA option is a more cost-effective method--primarily because the transportation of wastewater entails significant costs. More research is necessary, particularly with a focus on the development of treatment systems that integrate operator feedback and that facilitate greater re-use of fracking wastewater in fracking operations. In addition, new fracking methods need to be developed, which do not rely primarily on the use of water. Such new methods could eliminate the need for fracking wastewater treatment, as well as offer other benefits, such as sustainability and the elimination of some environmental impacts.
Form:
text
unmediated
volume
web address:
https://msoe.tind.io/record/936
Copy/Holding information
Location
Collection
Call No.
Status
Walter Schroeder Library
Master's Theses
AC805 .S3854 2017
Available
Add Copy to MyList
Format:
HTML
Plain text
Delimited
Subject:
Email to:
Horizon Information Portal 3.25_9885
© 2001-2013
SirsiDynix
All rights reserved.