MSOE Library Home
Login
My List - 0
Help
Home
Search
My Account
Basic
Advanced
Power
History
Search:
Author Keywords
Barcode
Bib No.
Call Number Keyword Search (Enter part of a call number -- use wildcards)
General Keyword Search
Keyword Search of Contents Notes
Keyword Search of Credits Notes (Enter word or words)
Keyword Search of Format
Keyword Search of Item Description
Keyword Search of Publisher's Name
Name Keyword Search
Publication Date Keyword Search
Search Part of an ISBN Number
Search Part of an ISSN Number
Series Title Keywords
Subject Keywords
Title Keywords
Refine Search
> You're searching:
Walter Schroeder Library, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Item Information
Holdings
More by this author
Elliott, Jeanne Kirk.
Subjects
Benchmarking (Management)
Organizational effectiveness
MSEM Thesis.
Browse Catalog
by author:
Elliott, Jeanne Kirk.
by title:
Benchmarking : an ap...
MARC Display
Benchmarking : an applications guide / by Jeanne Kirk Elliott.
by
Elliott, Jeanne Kirk.
Subjects
Benchmarking (Management)
Organizational effectiveness
MSEM Thesis.
Description:
iv, 96 leaves : ill. ; 29 cm.
Contents:
Advisor: James Spindler.
Committee members: Dr. Bruce Thompson, Gene Wright.
Introduction to benchmarking -- Benchmarking process -- Applications and examples -- Survey results - unsuccessful benchmarking studies -- Conclusions and recommendations..
The recommendation from this study is that Benchmarking can be used by any company as a productivity and performance improvement tool. This recommendation is the result of research and survey analysis. Benchmarking is different from other competitive analysis tools due to open communication between companies. It is not reverse engineering or after the fact design analysis. Benchmarking is a proactive way to obtain information and quickly adapt concepts to make changes in an operation or organization. The four phases of a Benchmarking study: Planning, Analysis, Integration and Action are discussed and divided into the process steps associated with each phase. Applications and examples of successful and unsuccessful studies are provided, with particular emphasis on unsuccessful studies. A survey was distributed to 200 people experienced in the benchmarking process. The survey was tailored to identify and obtain data on the frequency and characteristics of unsuccessful benchmarking projects. The survey was divided into four major areas of interest: Topic Definition and Scope, Benchmarking Process Elements, Documentation and Record Keeping and Management Support. Finally, methods to identify features of an unsuccessful benchmarking activity and measures to avoid failure are supplied.
Copy/Holding information
Location
Collection
Call No.
Status
Walter Schroeder Library
Master's Theses
AC805 .E45 1997
Available
Add Copy to MyList
Format:
HTML
Plain text
Delimited
Subject:
Email to:
Horizon Information Portal 3.25_9382
© 2001-2013
SirsiDynix
All rights reserved.