MSOE Library Home
Login
My List - 0
Help
Home
Search
My Account
Basic
Advanced
Power
History
Search:
Author Keywords
Barcode
Bib No.
Call Number Keyword Search (Enter part of a call number -- use wildcards)
General Keyword Search
Keyword Search of Contents Notes
Keyword Search of Credits Notes (Enter word or words)
Keyword Search of Format
Keyword Search of Item Description
Keyword Search of Publisher's Name
Name Keyword Search
Publication Date Keyword Search
Search Part of an ISBN Number
Search Part of an ISSN Number
Series Title Keywords
Subject Keywords
Title Keywords
Refine Search
> You're searching:
Walter Schroeder Library, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Item Information
Holdings
More by this author
Hodkiewicz, Nicole K.
Subjects
Water -- Pollution -- Law and legislation -- United States
Wetlands -- Law and legislation -- United States
Wetland conservation -- Government policy -- Wisconsin
Wetland mitigation -- Wisconsin
MSEM Thesis.
Browse Catalog
by author:
Hodkiewicz, Nicole K.
by title:
The clean water act,...
MARC Display
The clean water act, its impact on business development, and the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution / by Nicole K. Hodkiewicz.
by
Hodkiewicz, Nicole K.
Subjects
Water -- Pollution -- Law and legislation -- United States
Wetlands -- Law and legislation -- United States
Wetland conservation -- Government policy -- Wisconsin
Wetland mitigation -- Wisconsin
MSEM Thesis.
Description:
vii, 115 leaves : ill. ; 29 cm.
Contents:
Advisor: Donald Gallo.
Committee members: Dr. Bruce Thompson, Matthew Fuchs.
Introduction -- The Clean Water Act -- Business and economic development in consideration of wetland regulation -- The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution -- Analysis of study -- Findings and conclusions.
This thesis focuses on wetland regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Wetland regulations have been blamed for devaluing business development opportunities and infringing on private property rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The reason wetland regulations have been blamed is that one can not fill a wetland without a permit from federal and state governments. Reasons for individuals wishing to fill wetlands are varied. More common reasons include residential or commercial development, expansion of an existing plant operation, road building, and landfill locating. What has become known as the CWA was enacted in 1972 and amended in 1977 with the intention of protecting the Nation’s waters from degradation due to pollution. Section 404 of the CWA regulates dredging and filling in waters of the United States. Waters of the United States are not only considered to be lakes, rivers, and streams, but also wetlands. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (COE) is charged with administrating and enforcing Section 404 of the CWA. The COE enforces Section 404 through a permitting process. There are three wetland fill permits available from the COE: (1) Nationwide; (2) General; and (3) Individual. Each permit has limitations associated with it such as size of fill, type of fill, and wetland type. In addition to these permits, the State of Wisconsin has an additional step in obtaining a wetland fill permit: NR-103 Water Quality Certification. To fill a wetland in Wisconsin, one needs to procure one of the federal permits and state water quality certification issued by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). When applying for a federal 404 wetland fill permit and state water quality certification, documentation needs to accompany the permit application showing that the applicant has looked at alternatives to filling the wetland and for minimizing impacts caused by the filling. If a wetland fill is under two acres in Wisconsin and for a relatively routine types of activity, a federal nationwide permit is issued by the COE. This permit is relatively easy to obtain. State water quality certification is not as easy. In their review for water quality certification, the DNR looks at all the functions of a wetland to determine if the particular wetland filling proposed will be detrimental. They also look at the practical alternatives to filling the wetland. If alternatives exist, chances are slim for the DNR to issue water quality certification even if a federal permit had already been issued. This two step process has been criticized for being confusing and too stringent on the state’s part. The regulations and permitting process have been challenged as violating the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Fifth Amendment states: “...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
Copy/Holding information
Location
Collection
Call No.
Status
Walter Schroeder Library
Master's Theses
AC805 .H63 1997
Available
Add Copy to MyList
Format:
HTML
Plain text
Delimited
Subject:
Email to:
Horizon Information Portal 3.25_9885
© 2001-2013
SirsiDynix
All rights reserved.